home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1994
/
oct94.doc
/
000098_owner-lightwave-l _Sat Oct 8 08:33:19 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-03-23
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail3.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id GAA16598; Sat, 8 Oct 1994 06:37:14 -0700
Received: from mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu by mail3.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id GAA16591; Sat, 8 Oct 1994 06:37:12 -0700
Received: by mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu (Smail3.1.28.1 #20)
id m0qtbtT-000DKVC; Sat, 8 Oct 94 08:32 CDT
Received: by oubbs.telecom.uoknor.edu
id 00QSW01F Sat, 08 Oct 94 00:31:47
From: alan.chan@oubbs.telecom.uoknor.edu
Message-ID: <9410080031.00QSW01@oubbs.telecom.uoknor.edu>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 94 00:31:47
Subject: MAIL FAILED
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
> What I am getting (I went to the Dallas Demo last night) is "you
> don't
> understand that you don't need time code" from Newtek. They don't
> seem
> to understand how I use timecode--it's not just for video anymore.
> I would
> appreciate this simple response if they don't intend to support
> timecode---"We may not be the right platform for you at this time.
> But
> come see us in a couple of years." But instead, I'm told that I
> don't know
Ron, I was at the Dallas demo too, and what I got it to mean was that Newtek
wanted to project _the image_ of an all-encompassing system, and their
implementation of timecode would muddy the marketing strategy. Granted, that
sounds like a little bit of a wash to me, but I thought I heard the hint that
third-party developers would be jumping in to implement it, if not immediately,
then in six months or so. There is a serial port on the back of the Flyer,
totally unused, at this point..
AC